A Descriptive Study on the English Teachers’ Perception and Implementation of Curriculum 2013 at SMP Lab Hamzanwadi Pancor Lombok Timur

Bahasa Indonesia

  • Dzoharat Nabilah Mas

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the English teachers implement Curriculum 2013 in the teaching and learning process in the classroom. The implementation of Curriculum 2013 requires teachers to organize effective learning. There are at least five things that need to be considered with regard to the organization of learning in the implementation of Curriculum 2013, the implementation of learning, procurement and development experts, utilization of expertise and resources of the community, as well as the development and structuring policy. The successful learning in the implementation of the Curriculum 2013 is the entire process of learning, competence and character formation of students is planned. For this purpose, the core competencies, basic competencies, material standards, indicators of learning outcomes, and time should be set in accordance with the interests of learning so that learners are expected to have the opportunity and the optimal learning experience. This study was a descriptive qualitative research. Descriptive because it describes about the characteristics of a phenomenon being studied, and this study described about the English teachers’ perception and implementation in the Curriculum 2013. There were two variables in this study, the first one were the English teachers’ perception and the second one was implementation of the 2013 curriculum. The participants in this study there were two English teachers’ in SMP Lab. Hamzanwadi Pancor. The data of the study used documentation of Curriculum 2013, interview, and observation. Descriptive qualitative data analysis used in this study was adopted from the qualitative data analysis techniques of Huberman (1994) that was data reduction, data display, and verification. The result of the study shows that the English teachers’ perception at SMP Lab. Hamzanwadi found difficulties to implement the Curriculum 2013 before they followed the socialization and after they followed the socialization the English teachers have been trying to be professional in designing affective and meaningful learning process, learning organizations, learning approach, procedure and establishing effective competencies, as well as setting criteria for success. Besides, the implementation of Curriculum 2013 has been done by the English teachers at SMP Lab. Hamzanwadi Pancor.

References

Abdul, Karim Malik. Sejarah Perkembangan Kurikulum. http://malikabdulkarim.blogspot.com/2011/05/sejarah-perkembangan-kurikulum.html, Diakses tanggal 17 februari 2016.
Ali, Muhammad. Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah, (Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1992).
Amri, Sofan. 2013. Pengembangan dan Model Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Anderson, Lorin W. & Krathwohl, David R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.
Ary, Donald. et al. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Bebell, C. 1974. Evaluation and Curriculum Development Educational Leadership. Massachusetts: D.C Heath and Company.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Goleman, Daniel. 2005. Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Book.
http://www.solopos.com/2013/11/20/kurikulum-2013-guru-kesulitan-melaksanakan-466994 diunggah Rabu, 20 Nopember 2013 Pukul 13:50.
Idi, Abdullah. 2011. Pengembangan Kurikulum; Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Arruz Media.
Jazadi, Iwan. 2015. Character-Based Curriculum and Textbook Development in Indonesia: A Critical Review. ASPENSI (Association of Indonesia Scholars of History Education) in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaantentang Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). 2013. Jakarta: Mendikbud.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B. 1973. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Maki, P.L. 2010. Assesing for Learning: Building a Sustainable commitment Across the Institution. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Miller, J..P. 1996. The Holistic Curriculum. Toronto: OISE Press.
Mulyasa, E. 2007. Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Rosdakarya Bandung.
Nasution. 1993. Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.
Oliver, Albert I. 1977. Curriculum Improvement: A Guide to Problems, Priciples, and Process, Second Edition. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.
Pohan, Rusdin. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Lanarka.
Rookes, Paul. 2000. Perception: Theory, Development, and Organisation. USA and Canada: by Rouledge.
Rukiyah, Hadi. Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik.
http://hadirukiyah.blogspot.com/2010/07/kognitif-afektif-dan-psikokomotorik.html, Diakses tanggal 17 februari 2016.
http//:Komponen Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013 pada Bahan Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013 _ Kabar UPI.htm.
http//:seri-kurikulum-2013-prinsip-prinsip.html.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syaodih, nana. 1997. Pengembangan Kurikulum Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Zaifbio. Ranah Penilaian Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik. http://zaifbio.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/ranah-penilaian-kognitif-afektif-dan-psikomotorik, Diakses tanggal 17 februari 2016.
Published
2021-01-12
How to Cite
Mas, D. N. (2021). A Descriptive Study on the English Teachers’ Perception and Implementation of Curriculum 2013 at SMP Lab Hamzanwadi Pancor Lombok Timur: Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Elkatarie : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 3(2), 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1234/elkatarie.v3i2.4020
Section
Articles