PERANAN EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN
Keywords:
evaluation program, learning of processAbstract
Effort of is make-up of the quality of education need effort of[is make-up of the quality of study because estuary from various study program which with quality. Strive the make-up of study program need information result of programs evaluation of study previous. To be able to compile better study program, result of previous program evaluation represent reference which cannot be left . Yielded information to study program and also education program here in after. If the information can give more picture of comprehenship if study program evaluation reach evaluation to quality of study covering teacher performance, study facility, class climate, student attitude and motivation learn student and assessment of student result.References
Azwar, Saifuddin, 2005. Sikap, Manusia, Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Cox, J. 2006. The quality of an instructional program. National Education Association-Alaska. Diambil pada tanggal 21 Desember 2007, dari http://www.ak nea. Org./excellence/coxquality
Cruickshank, D.R. 1990, Research that inform teachers and teacher educators. Blongmington: Phi Delta KappaEducational Foundation.
Depdiknas, 2003, Sistem Penilaian Kelas SD, SMP, SMA dan SMK. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Ellis, A.K. 1998. Teaching and Learning elementary social studies. (6th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Madjid, Abd, 1426 H. “UUGD dan Dampaknya bagi Peningkatan Kualitas Guru†dalam At-Ta’dib Jurnal Kependidikan Islam Vol.3 No. 1
Moore, Kenneth D. 2001, Classroom Theaching Skill, New York: MC Grow Hill.
Rosyada, Dede. 2004. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis, Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam penyelenggaraan Pendidikan, Jakarta: Kencana.
Strack, J.S & Thomas, A. 1994, Assessment and Program Evaluation. Needham Heights: Simon & Schuster Custom Publising.
Silberman, M.1996. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach by Subject. Toronto:Allyn Bacon.
Supriyadi, Dedi. 1999, Mengangkat Citra dan Martabat Guru, Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
Surya, Mohammad. 2004. Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraisy.
Talbert, J.E. & M.E. McLaughlin. 1999. Understanding Teaching in Context†dalam Educational Leadership Vol.57 (3).
Zaini, Hisyam, dkk. 2002. Desain Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Center for Teaching and Staf Development, IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Cox, J. 2006. The quality of an instructional program. National Education Association-Alaska. Diambil pada tanggal 21 Desember 2007, dari http://www.ak nea. Org./excellence/coxquality
Cruickshank, D.R. 1990, Research that inform teachers and teacher educators. Blongmington: Phi Delta KappaEducational Foundation.
Depdiknas, 2003, Sistem Penilaian Kelas SD, SMP, SMA dan SMK. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Ellis, A.K. 1998. Teaching and Learning elementary social studies. (6th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Madjid, Abd, 1426 H. “UUGD dan Dampaknya bagi Peningkatan Kualitas Guru†dalam At-Ta’dib Jurnal Kependidikan Islam Vol.3 No. 1
Moore, Kenneth D. 2001, Classroom Theaching Skill, New York: MC Grow Hill.
Rosyada, Dede. 2004. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis, Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam penyelenggaraan Pendidikan, Jakarta: Kencana.
Strack, J.S & Thomas, A. 1994, Assessment and Program Evaluation. Needham Heights: Simon & Schuster Custom Publising.
Silberman, M.1996. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach by Subject. Toronto:Allyn Bacon.
Supriyadi, Dedi. 1999, Mengangkat Citra dan Martabat Guru, Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
Surya, Mohammad. 2004. Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraisy.
Talbert, J.E. & M.E. McLaughlin. 1999. Understanding Teaching in Context†dalam Educational Leadership Vol.57 (3).
Zaini, Hisyam, dkk. 2002. Desain Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Center for Teaching and Staf Development, IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.
