Perbedaan Hasil Tes Obyektif dan Tes Essay Dalam Bidang Studi Ekonomi Koperasi Di SMPN 1 Gratitunon Kabupaten Pasuruan
Abstract
The purpose of the research was carried out on each subject in the school to greatly assist teachers in assessing whether a given subject matter was successful and had achieved the planned targets. The test as an assessment tool could also help teachers measure the level of readiness of students in accepting new subject matter, through the test it would also be seen that a lesson could be continued or not. Tests could help teachers measure the extent to which student have abilities in school. This research used quantitative research with library research sources and field research. The research procedure used research operational objectives, research methods and designs, population and samples, research instruments, data collection and analysis. This research was conducted using the Z-test statistic, which was prove whether there was a difference in the learning outcomes of grade III students using objective tests and essay tests in the Cooperative Economics subject at SMPN 1 Gratitunon, Pasuruan Regency. The results of research testing the hypothesis, it turns out that the null hypothesis (ho) formulated is rejected because the Z observation or Z sample is greater than Z alpha. This condition proves that Z observation or Z sample = = -6,3647214 is in the rejection area, thus at the level of significanse 0.05 we accept the alternative hypothesis (ha), namely "there is a difference in the learning outcomes of grade III students of SMPN 1 Gratitunon. Pasuruan Regency in the subject of Cooperative Economics using objective tests and essay tests. Keywords : Differences in the results of objective tests and essay tests, the field of cooperative economicsReferences
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaari Republik Indonesia. 1983. Buku Materi III D Materi Dasar Program Mengajar Akta. Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta.
------,1993. Garis-garis Besar Haluan Negara (GBHN). Jakarta.
M. Surya. 1981. Psikologi Pendidikan. Tarsito. Bandung.
Ngalim Purwanto. 1985. Ilmu Pendidikan Teoritis dan Praktis. Remaja Karya. Bandung.
------. 1986. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. CV. Martina. Bandung.
------.1988. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik-teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Tarsito. Bandung.
Suharsimi Arikunto. 1987. Prosedur Penilaian. Bina Aksara. Jakarta.
Nasution, S. 1985. Didaktik Azas-azas Mengajar. Jemmars. Bandung.
Nolker dan Srchoenfiela. 1983. Proses Belajar Mengajar dengan Strategi SCBSA. PT. Rosda Jaya Putra. Bandung.
Slamento. 1988. Masalah-masalah Ilmu Keguruan. Bina Aksara. Jakarta.
Sumadi Suryabrata. 1984. Psikologi Pendidikan. CV. Rajawali. Jakarta.
Surachmat, Winarno. 1981. Penganfar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode dan Teknik. Tarsito. Bandung.
Sutrisno Hadi. 1975. Metode Research. Yugyakarta. Andi Offset.
------, 1988. Statistik Jilid | dan Il. Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Gajah Mada. Yogyakarta.
------, 1984. Statistik Jilid 2. YPFG. Bandung.
Utju Ali Basyah. 1981. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. FKIP Unsyiah. Banda Aceh.
Wayan Nurkancana dan Sumarta. 1978. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Usaha Nasional. Surabaya.
Winamo Surachmad. 1978. Pengantar Metodologi Ilmiah. Tarsito. Bandung.
------. 1989. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah. Tarsito. Bandung.
S.Nasution. 1982. Teknologi Pendidikan. Jemmar. Bandung.
Sudjana. 1984. Metode Statistik. Tarsito. Bandung.
Nasrun Harahap. 1982. Teknik Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bulan Bintang. Jakarta.

