Etika Informasi Digital Dalam Grup Whatsapp Keluarga: Praktik Tabayyun Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Muslim Di Indonesia
Abstract
Family WhatsApp groups represent a private digital space that plays a strategic role in the circulation of social, religious, and political information in Indonesia. Unlike public digital platforms, family-based digital spaces are structured by emotional ties, intergenerational hierarchies, and strong cultural values, which often prevent open information verification. This study aims to examine how Muslim university students interpret and practice tabayyun when encountering questionable information in family WhatsApp groups, and how power relations and emotions influence their decisions to remain silent, conduct personal verification, or engage in open clarification.This study employs a qualitative approach using digital ethnography (light netnography), combining limited digital observation and in-depth interviews with Muslim students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar who actively participate in family WhatsApp groups. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns of tabayyun practices and the dynamics of information ethics within private family digital spaces.The findings indicate that students predominantly practice tabayyun individually and implicitly rather than as a collective corrective action within the group. Decisions to correct information are shaped by issue sensitivity, family power relations, and emotional considerations such as reluctance and fear of offending parents. This study highlights a significant gap between normative awareness of tabayyun as an Islamic ethical principle and its actual practice in everyday family-based digital communication.Keywords: Islamic information ethics; family WhatsApp groups; digital tabayyun; Muslim students; digital literacyReferences
Ahmed, W. (2021). Echo chambers and misinformation. Social Media + Society.
Akmaliah, W. (2020). Hoaks dan politik identitas. Jurnal Maarif, 15(1).
Badrinathan, S., & Chauchard, S. (2024). Intimate publics and misinformation. Journal of Communication.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.
boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.
Cinelli, M., et al. (2021). The echo chamber effect. PNAS, 118(9).
Goh, K. Y., et al. (2022). Misinformation diffusion. Information Systems Research.
Guess, A., et al. (2020). Exposure to misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour.
Hochschild, A. (2012). The Managed Heart. University of California Press.
Kalogeropoulos, A., & Rossini, P. (2023). Family networks and news trust. Digital Journalism.
Kimbler, D., et al. (2023). WhatsApp in the Global South. New Media & Society.
Kundu, S., & Bej, T. (2025). Private digital spheres. Information, Communication & Society.
Lim, M. (2017). Many clicks but little action. Journal of Contemporary Asia.
Manzoor, A., et al. (2021). Digital citizenship among youth. Computers in Human Behavior.
Montagni, I., et al. (2021). Health digital literacy. JMIR Public Health.
Mustaqim, A. (2019). Etika Tafsir Kontemporer. LKiS.
Nashir, H. (2018). Islam Berkemajuan. Suara Muhammadiyah.
Nasrullah, R. (2020). Literasi Digital. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rahmawati, R., et al. (2021). COVID-19 rumors in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi.
Ruiz, C., & Nilsson, T. (2022). Digital intimacy and trust. Media, Culture & Society.
Saefulloh, M. (2024). Etika Islam dan media digital. Jurnal Dakwah.
Sathianathan, A., et al. (2025). Hoax dynamics. Journal of Information Ethics.
Shihab, M. Q. (2017). Tafsir Al-Mishbah (Vol. 13). Lentera Hati.
Sousa, A., et al. (2021). Misinformation in private messaging. Computers in Human Behavior.
Tandoc, E. C., et al. (2018). Defining fake news. Digital Journalism.
Copyright (c) 2026 hadisaputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contents on this site are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
.png)
1.png)
