Negotiations Future of Inclusive Islamic Law: A Study of Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim's Sharia Deconstruction Thought

Authors

  • Muhammad Syihabuddin Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • M. Samsul Hady Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v10i1.7207

Keywords:

Islamic Law, Inclusive, Deconstruction, an-Naim.

Abstract

Discourse on Islamic law is very important to be studied in more depth. This is because the study never ceases to be debated. In addition, Islamic law is required to continue to evolve and adjust to the times. The purpose of this paper is to understand 3 things: First, at a glance, an-Naim's thoughts related to Islamic law (sharia). Second, the methodology used in reformulating Sharia. The third is the idea of the future of inclusive Islamic law that spans the space and dynamics of the social development of society. The data were collected using a literature research model, a text-text approach in the form of books and articles. Then it was analyzed using data examination, classification, analysis, and followed by verification. The results found in the form of: 1) Sharia in an-Naim's view is not only fixated on the text of the Qur'an and Sunnah, but more than that it needs to be reinterpreted by looking at the context and reality that occurs today. 2) The methodology used by an-Naim is naskh-mansukh, by removing verses but not permanently (delaying the application of irrelevant verses). 3) The idea of an inclusive future for Islamic law is to provide space for every human being, the concept of equality in the realm of religion, ethnicity, race, and so on. This includes the renewal of criminal law, human rights, and international relations. The result that can be concluded is that Islamic law is acceptable to every community to be a role model that reflects progress and harmony with human life that has an impact on the benefit both in the Islamic world and internationally.

References

Abdillah, Junaidi. “Pembaruan Hukum Publik Syariah: Perspektif Abdullah Ahmed Al-Na’im.†Al-’Adalah Vol. XII, no. No. 2 (2014): 301–20.

Abshar, Fariz Ulul, Al Khanif, A’an Efendi, and Muktafi Muktafi. “Islam and Human Rights: Friend or Foe?†Addin 15, no. 2 (2021): 229. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v15i2.14868.

Akbar, Dwi Sagita, and Afifi Fauzi Abbas. “Pemikiran Abdullah An-Na’im Tentang Teori Evolusi Syariah (Nasakh) Dan Relevansinya Dengan Metode Istinbath Hukum Islam.†Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 05, no. 0 (2020): 1–21.

Amri, Rupi’i. “Reformasi Hukum Pidana Islam Kontemporer ( Studi Atas Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed an-Naim ).†Hukum Islam 17, no. 1 (2019): 1–19.

An-Na’im, Abdullah Ahmed. Dekonstruksi Syariah. Yogykarta: LKiS, 2006.

———. Islam Dan Negara Sekuler Menegosiasikan Masa Depan Syariah. Jakarta: Mizan, 2007.

———. Toward an Islamic Reformation, Civil Liberties, Human Rights and International Law. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1990.

Anshori, Muhammad. “Wawasan Baru Kajian Nasikh-Mansukh: Analisis Pemikiran MaḥmÅ«d ṬÄhÄ Dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim.†Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2019): 246–67. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v4i2.899.

Azra, Azyumardi. Pergolakan Politik Islam Dari Fundamentalisme, Modernisme, Hingga Postmodernisme. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1990.

Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Emzir. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2012.

Fariduddin, Ecep Ishak. “Kontekstualisasi Hukum Islam Dalam Realitas Sosial-Budaya Perspektif Wael B. Hallaq.†The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law 3, no. 1 (2022): 17–38.

Hanif, Muhammad Nadiddin Al. “Islamic Studies Dalam Konteks Global Dan Perkembanganya Di Indonesia.†TRILOGI: Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi, Kesehatan, Dan Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2021): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.33650/trilogi.v2i1.2863.

Harahap, Solehuddin. “Demokrasi Ditinjau Persfektif Siyasah Syariah.†Jurnal Hukum Islam 2, no. 3 (2020): 65–80.

Hilman, Didi. “Tindak Pidana Agama Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.†Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 1 (2020): 31. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v4i1.593.

Ichrom, Muhamad. “Hak Sipil Agama Dalam Piagam Madinah.†Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Keislaman 4, no. 2 (2020): 233–56. https://www.jurnalptiq.com/index.php/mumtaz/article/view/138.

Istiqlaliyah, Nur, and Abdul Kadir Riyadi. “Menyoal Universalitas Al-Qur’an: Kajian Atas Pemikiran Mahmoud Thaha Dalam ‘The Second Message.’†Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains 11, no. 2 (2022): 203–13. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v11i2.14034.

Khasan, Moh. “From Textuality To Universality The Evolution of HirÄbah Crimes in Islamic Jurisprudence.†Al-Jami’ah 59, no. 1 (2021): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.591.1-32.

Khufaya, Jihad, Muhammad Kholil, and Nurrohman Syarif. “Fenomena Hukum Islam Di Masa Modern; Upaya Harmonisasi Antara Eksistensi Dan Relevansi.†Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2021): 128–47. https://doi.org/10.47971/mjhi.v4i2.366.

Ma`arif, Muhammad Anas. “Book Review: Dekonstruksi Syariah Menurut Abdullah Ahmad An-Na`im†1, no. 1 (2020): 1–12.

Malik, Abdul. “Islam, Al-Qur’an, Dan Pembentukan Syari’at.†Al-Wajid: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–16.

Mariyam, Yurike Siti, Mohamad Yufidz Anwar I, Amad Fageh, Anni ’Ilma Rosyidah, and Habib Hidayatullah. “Deconstruction of Shariah Abdullah Ahmed An-Na’im; An Alternative Thinking of Sharia-Based Legal Reform.†Hukum Islam 23, no. 1 (2023): 124–37.

Mochammad, Zakiyal Fikri. “Kajian Kritis Tentang Nasikh Mansukh Dalam Al-Qur’an.†At-Taisir: Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies 01, no. 1 (2020): 30–34.

Mukti, Aji, Amira Fauzia Luberti, and Yumeiza Nurwinda Astuti. “Analysis Of Abdullah Ahmed An-Na’im’s Opinion In Renewing Sharia Public Law.†Milrev 1, no. 1 (2022): 115–33.

Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law.†Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2022): 155–86. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.5436.

Nasution, Martua. “Arah Baru Metode Pembaharuan Hukum Islam.†El-Ahli: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2, no. 2 (2021): 19–39.

Payuhi, Ferry. “An-Naim Dalam Merekonstruksi Kewarisan Non Muslim An-Naim in Reconstructing Non-Muslim Inheritance†18, no. 2 (2023): 108–15. https://doi.org/10.56338/iqra.v18i2.3643.

Samud, Samud, and Samud Samud. “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Perspektif Nilai Kemanusiaan Yang Adil Dan Beradab.†Inklusif (Jurnal Pengkajian Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Hukum Islam) 6, no. 1 (2021): 50. https://doi.org/10.24235/inklusif.v6i1.8439.

Theguh Saumantri, and Hajam Hajam. “Urgensi Metodologi Studi Islam Interdisipliner Untuk Moderasi Islam.†An-Nawa : Jurnal Studi Islam 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.37758/annawa.v4i1.579.

Sulthon, M. “Studi Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim Tentang Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Ham.†Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 10, no. 1 (2021): 6.

Supriyadi, Supriyadi. “Kajian Rekognisi Hak Masyarakat Adat Perspektif Propetik.†JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 5, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i2.1956.

Suwardiyati, Rumi, Siti Rohmah, Andi Muhammad Galib, and Abdul Halim. “Sharia and Human Rights Compatibility in Determining The Age of Marriage in Indonesia.†Nurani 21, No. 2 (2021): 263–74.

Taufiq, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim Tentang Dekontruksi Syariah Sebagai Sebuah Solusi.†International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 20, no. 2 (2018): 145–66. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.20.2.4044.

Thaha, Mahmoud Muhammad. Syariah Demokratik. Edited by Nur Rachman. Cetakan 1. Surabaya: Elsad, 1996.

Thaha, Mahmud Muhammad. The Second Message of Islam. Syracuse: University Press, 1987.

Thohir, Umar Faruq, Islam Zainul, Hasan Genggong, and Kraksaan Probolinggo. “Reinterpretasi Status Minoritas Dzimmi Di Tengah Mayoritas Muslim.†Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2020): 2548–5903.

Ubaidillah, M. Hasan. “Dekontruksi Syariah Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Islam: Kajian Terhadap Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed Al-Naim.†Ab-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist 2, no. 1 (2019): 97–109.

Yusdani, Yusdani. “Islamic Law and Contemporary Challenges from Fresh Ijtihad Point of View.†Jurnal Hukum Islam 20, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v20i1.5991.

Zayadi, Zayadi, Abd. Muid N, and Kholilurrohman Kholilurrohman. “Penerapan Teori Nasikh Dan Mansukh Mahmoud Muhammed Taha Pada Ayat-Ayat Kebebasan Beragama.†COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, no. 06 (2023): 2317–31. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i06.1013.

Zuhdi, Muhammad Harfin. “Moderate Islam: The Response of Islamic Law Toward Contemporary Issues in Indonesia,†2022, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DGWTK.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

Syihabuddin, M., & Hady, M. S. . (2024). Negotiations Future of Inclusive Islamic Law: A Study of Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim’s Sharia Deconstruction Thought. Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v10i1.7207

Issue

Section

Articles