Comparative Study on Criminal Penalties According to The Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and The Indonesian Criminal Law Code

Authors

  • Miftahul Ulum Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • Nasiri Nasiri STAI Taruna Surabaya
  • Nora Repo Hermannin Diakoniatalo, Helsinki, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v9i1.6114

Keywords:

comparative, criminal, Islam and law.

Abstract

The issue of punishment in Islam is by raising one type of punishment that is often not brought to the surface, namely the fine (diyat) as an alternative type of punishment. Sentencing also costs a lot of money, for example in the costs of court proceedings, imprisonment, parole, consultation centers that must be attended, and collection of fines. The method used in this research is a normative juridical comparison between Islamic Law and the Criminal Code (KUHP). The research specification used is descriptive analysis. The data collected and processed to support this research used library research which was processed qualitatively. All of our data is separated by data that is relevant or irrelevant to this research. The results of the research and data analysis in this study state that: first, in Islamic Criminal Law there is no such thing as a complaint offense, all jarimahs, be it hudud, qishos, diyat, and takzir, are all ordinary offenses. Adultery in Islamic law is not a complaint offense, whereas in the Criminal Code Article 284 the crime of adultery is a complaint offense, and is included in the category of absolute complaint offense. Second, in proving adultery in Islamic criminal law, it is proven by four things: testimony, confession, qarinah (indication), and li'an. However, this is not the case with the Criminal Code, because the criminal act of adultery is included in the category of an absolute complaint offense, there must be a complaint beforehand so that the offense can be processed

References

Abdul Qadir Audah. Al Tasyri’ Al Jinaly Fi Al Islamiy. Beirut: Daar al-Kitab.

Adam Chazawi. 2007. Tindak Pidana Mengenal Kesopanan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Agus Santoso, Muhari. 2011. Paradigma Baru Hukum Pidana. Malang: Averroes Press.

Akhiar, Salmi. 2015. Eksistensi Hukuman Mati. Jakarta: Aksara Persada.

Al-Asqolani, Ibn Hajar. 2007. Terjemahan lengkap Bulghul Maram. Jakarta: Akbar.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2014. Tinjaun Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

As’ad, Aliy. 1979. Terjemah Fathul Mu’in. Yogyakarta: Menara Kudus.

Aziz Syamsuddin. 2011. Tindak Pidana Khusus. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2000. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bakhri, Syaiful. 2009. Perkembangan Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Betty, Scharf. 1995. Kajian Sosiologi Agama. Jakarta: Pusataka Gramendia.

D. Schaffmeister. 2007. Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fuad. 2004. Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Malang: UMM Press.

Hakim, Rahmat. 2011. Hukum Pidana Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Hamzah Hasan. 2012. Kejahatan Kesusilaan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Makasar: Alaudin University Press.

Hamzah, Andi. 2010. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hanafi, Ahmad. 2005. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta : PT Bulan bintang.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/77620929.pdf

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/3236-ID-eksistensi-pidana-denda-menurut-sistem-kuhp.pdf

Huda, Chairul. Tinjaun Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

Kansil. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Koto, Alaiddin. 2013. Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Laden Marpaung. 2005. Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

--------------------. 2000. Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lamintang. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Loebbye, Logman. 1992. Laporan Pengkajian Hukum tentang Penerapan Pidana Denda. Jakarta: BPHN Dep. Keh. RI.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. 2011. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mufaizin, Mufaizin Mufaizin. "STUDI HADITS (Pengantar Teoritis Memahami Hadits & Ilmu Hadits)."

Mufaizin, Mufaizin. "Peran Keteladanan Orang Tua terhadap Pembentukan Kepribadian Muslim Anak." Al-Insyiroh 1.1: 134-161.

Majieb, Abdoel. 2011. Istilah Fiqh. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Moeljatno. 2008. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Moeljiatno. 2006. KUHP. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, Cet. 25.

Moleong, Lexy. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prasetyawati, Endang, et al. "Penyuluhan Hukum dan Bakti Sosial Tentang Perkawinan Dini di Pondok Pesantren Darul Hikmah Desa Langkap, Kecamatan Burneh, Kabupaten Bangkalan." pshpm: Prosiding Seminar Hasil Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2022.

Raharjo, Satjipto. 2008. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Rahmat Hakim. 2000. Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqih Jinayah). Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Ramdhan, Tri Wahyudi. "Dimensi Moderasi Islam." Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 2.2 (2018): 29-48.

Soerjono Soekamto.1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Stephen, Sanderson. 2009. Sosiologi Makro Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Realitas Sosial. Jakarta : Rajawali Press.

Suparni, Niniek. 2008. Eksistensi Pidana Denda dalam Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.

Syaikhon, Muhammad, Nanang Rokhman Saleh, and Bahrul Ulum. "The Role of Principal in Improving PAI Learning in The Corona Pandemic Period in RA TAAM Adinda Care to Overcome Gresik." Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7.2 (2021): 75-88.

Teguh Prasetyo. 2010. Kriminalisasi dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Ulum, Miftahul, “Supremasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia“, Al-Jinayah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, Vol. 5 Nomor 1 Juli 2019.

Ulum, Miftahul. “Fikih Organisasi (Reaktualisasi Sejarah Nahdlatul Ulama di Indonesia)â€, Al-Insyiroh Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 5 Nomor 2 (September 2019).

Ulum, Miftahul. “The Concept of Maslahah By Al-Imam Malik And Al-Imam Al-Tufi (Comparatif Study of Maslahah Al-Imam Malik and Al-Imam Najm al-Din Al-Tufi)â€, Veteran Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 1 (November, 2018).

Waluyo, Bambang. 2011. Bambang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wardi Muslich, Ahmad. 2014. Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam Fikih Jinayah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 2003. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-26

How to Cite

Ulum, M., Nasiri, N., & Repo, N. (2023). Comparative Study on Criminal Penalties According to The Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and The Indonesian Criminal Law Code . Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 9(1), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v9i1.6114

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.