MENAKAR BUDAYA LITERASI DI PESANTREN; Siginifikansi dan Relevansi Metode Programme for International Student Assessment

Penulis

  • Zaini Tamin AR STAI YPBWI Surabaya
  • Kusaeri Kusaeri UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Hanik Yuni Alfiyah Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
  • Nia Indah Purnamasari STAI YPBWI Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v13i01.4356

Kata Kunci:

Literacy Culture, Pesantren, PISA.

Abstrak

Kebanyakan penelitian tentang literasi terfokus pada lembaga pendidikan formal seperti sekolah atau perguruan tinggi. Tidak banyak penelitian yang membahas terkait budaya literasi di lembaga pesantren. Dan sejauh ini, masih belum ada penelitian yang membahas terkait evaluasi budaya literasi di pesantren menggunakan Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Oleh sebab itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis signifikansi dan relevansi metode PISA sebagai alat penilai budaya literasi di pesantren. Melalui studi pustaka - dengan sumber-sumber terkini yang relevan - penelitian ini menemukan bahwa, budaya literasi di pesantren telah mengakar dalam sejarah penyebaran Islam di Indonesia. Namun, hal ini jarang diteliti karena term literasi kerap diidentikkan dengan pendidikan di lembaga pendidikan umum. Untuk menilai kentalnya budaya literasi di pesantren, metode PISA paling komprehensif dan ketat untuk menilai kinerja, menterjemahkan, mengambil sampel dan mengumpulkan data tentang santri, keluarga, dan faktor kelembagaan yang dapat membantu menjelaskan perbedaan kinerja dan keterampilan literasi mereka. Penulis berargumen bahwa PISA memiliki relevansi untuk menilai budaya literasi di pesantren. Dalam hal ini, domain literasi membaca dalam PISA dapat dijadikan istrumen penilaian budaya iqra’, hifdz, bandongan, sorogan, mushawarah, muthala’ah, bahtsul masail dan lain sebagainya. Penelitian ini dapat dijadikan penegas bahwa begitu kentalnya budaya literasi di pesantren yang selama ini kerap luput dari perhatian. 

Referensi

Ahmad, Irfan. “Democracy and Islam”. Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 37 (2011).
Asrohah, Hanun. “Pelembagaan Pesantren: Asal-usul dan Perkembangan Pesantren di Jawa”. Disertasi----IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2002.
Bailey, Richard. “Student Writing and Academic Literacy Development at University”, Journal of Learning and Student Experience, Vol. 1 (December 2018).
Bybee, Rodger et., al, “PISA 2006: An Assessment of Scientific Literacy”. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, Vol. 46, No. 8 (2009): 865–883.
Dariah, Atih Rohaeti, et., al. “A New Approach For Sustainable Development Goals In Islamic Perspective”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 219 (2016).
Diem, Chuzaimah Dahlan & Atmanegara, Yunani. “Cultivating Children’s Reading Habit: Literacy Learning Enhancement In The Digitization Era”, International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Apr-Jun 2014).
Genlott, Annika Agelii & Gronlund, Ake. “Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested“. Computers & Education, Vol. 67 (2013).
Grek, Sotiria. “Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe”. Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1 (2009).
Hendoanto, Aan. “How Students Solves PISA Tasks: An Overview of Students’ Mathematical Literacy”. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME), Vol. 2, No. 2, (September 2018).
Kress, G. Literacy in the New Media Age. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Lee, Carol D., & Spratley, Anika. Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2010.
Nathanson, Steven, et, al., “The Reading Habits and Literacy Attitudes of Inservice and Prospective Teachers”. Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 59, No. 4 (September/October 2008).
National Center for Education Statistics. Highlights From the 2000 Program for International Student Assessment. USA: PISA USA, 2001.
Nicol, D. “Assessment for Learner Self-Regulation: Enhancing Achievement in The First Year Using Learning Technologies”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 3 (2009): 335–52.
_______. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice”. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 2 (2006).
Nilan, Pam. “The ‘Spirit of Education’ in Indonesian Pesantren”, British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 30, No. 2 (March 2009): 219–232.
OECD. “PISA 2018 Result”, dalam https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf. Diakses pada 29 Januari 2021.
______. “What is PISA?”, in PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
______. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow; Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD, 2003.
______. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework; Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD, 2009.
Oghenekohwo, Jonathan E. & Frank-Oputu, Ekima A. “Literacy Education and Sustainable Development in Developing Societies”, International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, Vol. 5 No. 2 (April 2017).
Papen, Uta Papen, “Literacy and development: what works for whom? or, how relevant is the social practices view of literacy for literacy education in developing countries?”, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 25 (2005).
Paran, Amos & Williams, Eddie. “ Editorial: reading and literacy in developing countries”. Journal of Research in Reading, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2007).
Pohl, Florian. “Islamic Education and Civil Society: Reflections on the "Pesantren" Tradition in Contemporary Indonesia”. Comparative Education Review, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Aug 2006).
Purcell-Gates, Victoria, Perry, K., & Briseño, A. “Analyzing Literacy Practice: Grounded Theory to Model”. Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 45, No. 1 (2011).
___________________, et.al., “Measuring Situated Literacy Activity: Challenges and Promises”. Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 44, No. 4 (2012).
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemendikbud RI, “Tentang PISA”, dalam https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/tentang-pisa. Diakses pada 29 Januari 2021.
Rahayani, Yayan. “Restructuring and Redesigning The Pesantren Toward An Effective Educational Institution”. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, Vol. 4, No. 2 (December 2017).
Sang, Yuan. “Expanded Territories of “Literacy”: New Literacies and Multiliteracies”. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.8, (2017).
Smith, Calvin Douglas, et. al. “Assessment Literacy and Student Learning: The Case for Explicitly Developing Students ‘Assessment Literacy’”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 38, No. 1 (2011).
Stacey, Kaye. “The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia”. Journal on Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2011).
Suharso, Putut & Sarbini. “Coastal Community Response to the Movement of Literacy: a study on literacy culture in Demak pesantren’s”. E3S Web Conference, Vol. 47 (2018).
Thomson, Sue., Hillman, Kylie., & Bortoli, Lisa De. A Teacher’s Guide to PISA Reading Literacy. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press, 2013.
USAID. Best Practices for Developing Supplementary Reading Materials: Final Report. New York: USAID, 2014.
Wallendorf, Melanie. “Literally Literacy”. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27, No. 4 (March 2001).
Walton, Geoff. “Information Literacy is a Subversive Activity: Developing a Research-Based Theory of Information Discernment”. Journal of Information Literacy, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2017).
Wu, M. “Comparing the Similarities and Differences of PISA 2003 and TIMSS”. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 32, (2010).

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2021-10-08

Cara Mengutip

AR, Z. T., Kusaeri, K., Alfiyah, H. Y., & Purnamasari, N. I. (2021). MENAKAR BUDAYA LITERASI DI PESANTREN; Siginifikansi dan Relevansi Metode Programme for International Student Assessment. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam, 10(01), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v13i01.4356

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama

Obs.: Plugin ini minimal membutuhkan satu plugin statistik/laporan aktif. Jika plugin statistik menghasilkan lebih dari satu metrik, pilihlah metrik utama pada pengaturan halaman admin dan/atau pada halaman pengaturan manajer jurnal.